- Posts: 6
DC module deviation from STC
- karthik61
- Topic Author
Less
More
01 Jun 2020 23:59 #8261
by karthik61
Replied by karthik61 on topic DC module deviation from STC
Good Day Paul,
Decreasing GCR reduced the module loss. But I would like to keep a row spacing of 1.75 m between two arrays.
Attached the PV system design for reference.
And I kept the same pitch: 1.75 m and GCR: 95.4% in PVsyst and I got less module loss and more Annual energy output under same conditions.
Thanks,
Karthik.
Decreasing GCR reduced the module loss. But I would like to keep a row spacing of 1.75 m between two arrays.
Attached the PV system design for reference.
And I kept the same pitch: 1.75 m and GCR: 95.4% in PVsyst and I got less module loss and more Annual energy output under same conditions.
Thanks,
Karthik.
Attachments:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kon
Less
More
- Posts: 2
02 Jun 2020 01:45 #8262
by kon
Replied by kon on topic DC module deviation from STC
Hi all,
How exactly the "DC module deviation from STC" is calculated? I cannot find a good reference and in some of my calculations this parameter enhances the performance of the pv-system and I don't understand why.
Best regards,
Konrad
How exactly the "DC module deviation from STC" is calculated? I cannot find a good reference and in some of my calculations this parameter enhances the performance of the pv-system and I don't understand why.
Best regards,
Konrad
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pgilman
Less
More
- Posts: 5423
02 Jun 2020 15:46 #8264
by pgilman
Replied by pgilman on topic DC module deviation from STC
Hi Konrad,
There is a long discussion about the module loss value in this issue on GitHub (see also the link to Issue #197 mentioned in the comments):
github.com/NREL/ssc/issues/205
Best regards,
Paul.
There is a long discussion about the module loss value in this issue on GitHub (see also the link to Issue #197 mentioned in the comments):
github.com/NREL/ssc/issues/205
Best regards,
Paul.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pgilman
Less
More
- Posts: 5423
02 Jun 2020 16:37 #8265
by pgilman
Replied by pgilman on topic DC module deviation from STC
Hi Karthik,
Based on the information you provided, I calculate GCR = 0.51:
GCR = 1.74 / ( 1.74 * cos( 20 ) + 1.75 ) = 0.514
I used SAM's parametric simulations in the attached .sam file to generate this table showing the annual output and "module deviation from STC" loss for a range of GCR values:
Best regards,
Paul.
Based on the information you provided, I calculate GCR = 0.51:
GCR = 1.74 / ( 1.74 * cos( 20 ) + 1.75 ) = 0.514
I used SAM's parametric simulations in the attached .sam file to generate this table showing the annual output and "module deviation from STC" loss for a range of GCR values:
Best regards,
Paul.
Attachments:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- karthik61
- Topic Author
Less
More
- Posts: 6
02 Jun 2020 23:49 #8267
by karthik61
Replied by karthik61 on topic DC module deviation from STC
Hallo Paul,
Thanks a lot for the simulation.
But in SAM row spacing of 1.75 m is different from the one you calculated (1.74 * cos( 20 ) + 1.75 ).
And also in the attached PV system design, the arrays are closer with a total pitch(row spacing) of 1.75 m only, this leads to GCR 0.954 (same in case of PVSyst)
Thanks,
Karthik.
Thanks a lot for the simulation.
But in SAM row spacing of 1.75 m is different from the one you calculated (1.74 * cos( 20 ) + 1.75 ).
And also in the attached PV system design, the arrays are closer with a total pitch(row spacing) of 1.75 m only, this leads to GCR 0.954 (same in case of PVSyst)
Thanks,
Karthik.
Attachments:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kon
Less
More
- Posts: 2
03 Jun 2020 01:15 #8269
by kon
Replied by kon on topic DC module deviation from STC
Thank you Paul, very interesting discussion indeed!
Best,
Konrad
Best,
Konrad
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: pgilman