- Posts: 5423
DC module deviation from STC
- pgilman
Less
More
04 Dec 2023 16:40 #12719
by pgilman
Replied by pgilman on topic DC module deviation from STC
Hi Zeynep,
Please attach a .sam file and a copy of the weather file you are using if you would like me to help troubleshoot.
Best regards,
Paul.
Please attach a .sam file and a copy of the weather file you are using if you would like me to help troubleshoot.
Best regards,
Paul.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- zeynepcelik
Less
More
- Posts: 5
05 Dec 2023 19:51 - 06 Dec 2023 15:53 #12731
by zeynepcelik
Replied by zeynepcelik on topic DC module deviation from STC
Attachments:
Last edit: 06 Dec 2023 15:53 by pgilman. Reason: Attach image as .png and insert into editor.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- zeynepcelik
Less
More
- Posts: 5
06 Dec 2023 06:20 #12734
by zeynepcelik
Replied by zeynepcelik on topic DC module deviation from STC
Hi, I tried attaching some screenshots and the file but it didn't work it seems. I am attaching the file again now. Thank you!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pgilman
Less
More
- Posts: 5423
06 Dec 2023 16:42 #12737
by pgilman
Replied by pgilman on topic DC module deviation from STC
Hi Zeynep,
Thank you for attaching your .sam file.
This thread is about using POA irradiance as input, but your file is using the default DNI and DHI as input. In your case, the module "deviation from STC" loss is high because of shading. The partial shading model calculates shading loss as a reduction in DC output, and as the screenshot of your 3D shading scene shows, there is significant shading between modules.
You are have enabled both beam irradiance losses by time step and solar azimuth-by-altitude beam irradiance shading, which seems like you might be double-counting the effect of shading. You have also enabled self shading by enabling, although because GCR = 0.3 self shading is not having a large impact. I think I would recommend using one shading model instead of three.
Best regards,
Paul.
Thank you for attaching your .sam file.
This thread is about using POA irradiance as input, but your file is using the default DNI and DHI as input. In your case, the module "deviation from STC" loss is high because of shading. The partial shading model calculates shading loss as a reduction in DC output, and as the screenshot of your 3D shading scene shows, there is significant shading between modules.
You are have enabled both beam irradiance losses by time step and solar azimuth-by-altitude beam irradiance shading, which seems like you might be double-counting the effect of shading. You have also enabled self shading by enabling, although because GCR = 0.3 self shading is not having a large impact. I think I would recommend using one shading model instead of three.
Best regards,
Paul.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- zeynepcelik
Less
More
- Posts: 5
07 Dec 2023 13:39 #12743
by zeynepcelik
Replied by zeynepcelik on topic DC module deviation from STC
Hi Paul,
Thank you so much for pointing that out! Now I understand the difference and where I was going wrong.
Thank you so much for pointing that out! Now I understand the difference and where I was going wrong.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: pgilman