Trough system power estimates

  • ms9876789
  • Topic Author
More
15 Jul 2019 12:36 #7540 by ms9876789
Trough system power estimates was created by ms9876789
Hi,
 
In SAM 2018.11.11, the magnitude from highest to lowest is as follows:  
A. Cycle electrical power output (gross) (MWe)
B. System power generated (kW)
C. Cycle electrical power output (net) (MWe)

In SAM 2013.1.11, the magnitude from highest to lowest is as follows:  
D. Gross electric power output (MWh) hourly
E. Net electric power output (kWh) hourly
F. Hourly Energy Delivered (kWh)

Why does the order changes in the two versions of SAM ?
What is the difference between B and C ?  
Is B the same as F ?

Thanks

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • pgilman
More
17 Jul 2019 10:14 #7554 by pgilman
Replied by pgilman on topic Trough system power estimates
Hi Michael,

I'm not sure why the programmers changed the naming convention for those variables between versions 2018.11.11 and 2013.1.11.

In SAM 2018.11.11, the difference between B and C is determined by the "Availability and Curtailment" inputs on the Power Cycle page. By default there is a 4% "constant loss" value that SAM applies to B to calculate C.

The lowest value should represent the electricity delivered to the grid, so I would expect F to be equivalent to C.

Best regards,
Paul.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • ms9876789
  • Topic Author
More
17 Jul 2019 10:30 - 17 Jul 2019 10:45 #7555 by ms9876789
Replied by ms9876789 on topic Trough system power estimates
Hi Paul,

Thanks for your reply.

You mentioned that you would expect C (net output in SAM 2018.11.11) to be equivalent to F (energy delivered in SAM 2013.1.15), Please elaborate further because SAM 2013.1.15 gives net output also?

Are you saying that A=D, B=F, and C=E ?
If yes, then why are the order (from highest to lowest value) changes between the 2 versions of SAM.
In SAM 2018.11.11, it is A, B, then C regardless of input values to SAM.
In SAM 2013.1.11, it is D, E, then F regardless of input values to SAM.
Last edit: 17 Jul 2019 10:45 by ms9876789.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • pgilman
More
17 Jul 2019 11:28 #7556 by pgilman
Replied by pgilman on topic Trough system power estimates
Hi Michael,

The order of the variables is a better indicator of what values they represent than their names because the developers changed the variable names between versions.

Best regards,
Paul.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Redelinghuys
More
16 Aug 2020 05:44 #8587 by Redelinghuys
Replied by Redelinghuys on topic Trough system power estimates
Dear Paul

I trust you are well.

I am working on a PBT physical model using the 2020.2.29 version of SAM.

I am trying to determine an adequate design cycle thermal efficiency for the Rankine cycle, for which the default is given as 0.356 (my model: air-cooled, ITD @ design = 16 degC, ambient temp @ design = 30 degC, turbine inlet = fixed pressure).

Upon post-processing my results in Excel, I try to "recreate" this efficiency as n_th = W_net/Q_in:
1. Using System power generated / PC input energy
2. Using PC electrical power output: gross / PC input energy

Overall, method 1 produces lower efficiencies than method 2. Regarding this, what is the exact difference between the numerators in 1 and 2 in terms of W_net? Which one provides a better indication of power cycle conversion efficiency given the heat input?

Furthermore, I note these efficiencies from 1,2 are overall lower than the design input parameter. Would this mean that the default design cycle thermal efficiency is not a realistic description of the actual cycle at hand? 
Would it make sense to use option 1 or 2 (depending on which is more accurate) and produce a histogram to determine which thermal efficiency is most frequently encountered in the year, and then update the default thermal efficiency @ design with this calculated value? 

How would one go about to determine a realistic/representative thermal efficiency for the power cycle as a design parameter input? The Chambadal-Novikov relation seems to produce more "realistic" results, especially in the range of 1:
T_H = 373 degC (turbine inlet temp @ design, taken from the SAM PBT documentation).
T_L = T_sat @ P_cond = 8.5 kPa = 42.5 degC at design (8.5 kPa taken from the SAM PBT documentation).
Then, eta_th = 1 - sqrt[(T_L+273.15)/(T_H+273.15)] = 0.301, which is < 0.365.

Any advice on how to best determine this input parameter will be greatly appreciated.

Best regards
Louw

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • pgilman
More
17 Aug 2020 11:36 #8595 by pgilman
Replied by pgilman on topic Trough system power estimates
Hi Louw,

For SAM's physical trough model, "PC electrical output: gross (MWe)" is the gross output of the power cycle. It does not account for parasitic loads required for freeze protection or defined under "Plant Energy Consumption"  or "System Availability" on the System Control page. It also does not account for any adjustments made to meet interconnection requirements defined the Grid Limits input page. "System power generated (kW)" is the power delivered to the grid, and accounts for all of these items.

I'll see what my CSP colleagues say about the power cycle thermal efficiency input parameter and get back to you on that.

Best regards,
Paul.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: pgilman
Powered by Kunena Forum