Pvwattsv5 default 'adjust:factor' ?

  • James M.S. Barile
  • Topic Author
More
28 Jan 2015 11:45 #3005 by James M.S. Barile
Pvwattsv5 default 'adjust:factor' ? was created by James M.S. Barile
Dear Paul and SAM Support,

Could you explicate the meaning of the 'adjust:factor' input for (November-updated) pvwattsv5 and pvwattsv1 modules?

Our lab does not have a known value for the required adjust:factor; could you recommend a default value?

Thank you kindly,

James

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • pgilman
More
30 Jan 2015 12:21 #3006 by pgilman
Replied by pgilman on topic Pvwattsv5 default 'adjust:factor' ?
Dear James,
The adjust:factor input is for the "curtailment and availability" factors that you can see in the SAM user interface on the PVWatts System Design input page. Only the "Constant adjustment factor" adjust:factor is required, and you can set its value to 1 to model a system with no losses. This is true for versions of the SDK that you download before January 30, 2015.
We are preparing to release an update to SAM and the SDK in which we've changed those from factors to losses to be consistent with the rest of the mode. In that version, you would want to set the adjust:factor value to zero instead of one.
Please use SDKtool with your version of SSC to make sure you know whether your version is modeling the input as a set of loss factors with values between 0 and 1 or as a set of losses with values between 0 and 100%. 
The purpose of this input is to model operational and other losses such as system curtailment, equipment downtime for maintenance, etc.
Best regards,

Paul.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • pgilman
More
11 Jul 2024 12:21 #13302 by pgilman
Replied by pgilman on topic Pvwattsv5 default 'adjust:factor' ?
See github.com/NREL/pysam/issues/164 for a workaround to an issue with the 'adjust' inputs in PySAM 5.1.0.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: pgilman
Powered by Kunena Forum