- Posts: 2
Pvwattsv5 default 'adjust:factor' ?
- James M.S. Barile
- Topic Author
        Less
        More
        
            
    
        
            
        
                28 Jan 2015 11:45                #3005
        by James M.S. Barile
    
    
            
            
            
            
            
                                
    
                                                
    
        Pvwattsv5 default 'adjust:factor' ? was created by James M.S. Barile            
    
        Dear Paul and SAM Support,
Could you explicate the meaning of the 'adjust:factor' input for (November-updated) pvwattsv5 and pvwattsv1 modules?
Our lab does not have a known value for the required adjust:factor; could you recommend a default value?
Thank you kindly,
James
    Could you explicate the meaning of the 'adjust:factor' input for (November-updated) pvwattsv5 and pvwattsv1 modules?
Our lab does not have a known value for the required adjust:factor; could you recommend a default value?
Thank you kindly,
James
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Paul Gilman
        Less
        More
        
            
    
        - Posts: 5665
            
        
                30 Jan 2015 12:21                #3006
        by Paul Gilman
    
    
            
            
            
            
            
                                
    
                                                
    
        Replied by Paul Gilman on topic Pvwattsv5 default 'adjust:factor' ?            
    
        Dear James,
The adjust:factor input is for the "curtailment and availability" factors that you can see in the SAM user interface on the PVWatts System Design input page. Only the "Constant adjustment factor" adjust:factor is required, and you can set its value to 1 to model a system with no losses. This is true for versions of the SDK that you download before January 30, 2015.
We are preparing to release an update to SAM and the SDK in which we've changed those from factors to losses to be consistent with the rest of the mode. In that version, you would want to set the adjust:factor value to zero instead of one.
Please use SDKtool with your version of SSC to make sure you know whether your version is modeling the input as a set of loss factors with values between 0 and 1 or as a set of losses with values between 0 and 100%. 
The purpose of this input is to model operational and other losses such as system curtailment, equipment downtime for maintenance, etc.
Best regards,
Paul.
    
    The adjust:factor input is for the "curtailment and availability" factors that you can see in the SAM user interface on the PVWatts System Design input page. Only the "Constant adjustment factor" adjust:factor is required, and you can set its value to 1 to model a system with no losses. This is true for versions of the SDK that you download before January 30, 2015.
We are preparing to release an update to SAM and the SDK in which we've changed those from factors to losses to be consistent with the rest of the mode. In that version, you would want to set the adjust:factor value to zero instead of one.
Please use SDKtool with your version of SSC to make sure you know whether your version is modeling the input as a set of loss factors with values between 0 and 1 or as a set of losses with values between 0 and 100%. 
The purpose of this input is to model operational and other losses such as system curtailment, equipment downtime for maintenance, etc.
Best regards,
Paul.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Paul Gilman
        Less
        More
        
            
    
        - Posts: 5665
            
        
                11 Jul 2024 12:21                #13302
        by Paul Gilman
    
    
            
            
            
            
            
                                
    
                                                
    
        Replied by Paul Gilman on topic Pvwattsv5 default 'adjust:factor' ?            
    
        See 
    github.com/NREL/pysam/issues/164
 for a workaround to an issue with the 'adjust' inputs in PySAM 5.1.0.    
    Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
        Moderators: Paul Gilman    
 
  
 















