Constant weather inputs but non-steady state gross output

  • williampaulbell
  • Topic Author
More
06 Aug 2014 04:11 #2470 by williampaulbell
Hello Paul

Could you help with the following query please regarding constant weather inputs but non-steady state gross power output?

Table 1 below shows the input for SAM that is kept constant for every hour. Table 2 shows a sample of a daily cycle from SAM's output that is the Gross Power Output.

I assume that SAM recognises the constant inputs and adjusts the DNI to follow an idealised daily cycle based on the time, latitude, longitude and elevation of the site.

I also assume that SAM recognises non-constant input of DNI and does not adjust the DNI for some idealised daily cycle.

Could you advise if my assumptions are correct?

Regards

William Bell


Table 1: SAM input - constant weather variables
DNI (W/m2): 767
Dry temperature (°C): 26.1
Relative humidity (%): 55
Pressure (hPa): 989.5


Table 2: SAM output - daily cycle but expecting steady state
Gross cycle power output (MWh), hourly
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.90196
23.0868
32.7346
35.2751
35.2808
11.3107
8.00759
7.24606
6.26285
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Paul Gilman
More
06 Aug 2014 16:06 #2471 by Paul Gilman
Dear William,
Does Table 1 show values that you used to create an hourly weather file with constant values?
It's hard for me to tell what the results in Table 2 mean without seeing the SAM file (.zsam) and weather file. Would you mind attaching those to your original post (Edit the post and then attach the files)?
Best regards,

Paul.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • williampaulbell
  • Topic Author
More
07 Aug 2014 22:35 #2472 by williampaulbell
Hello Paul

Thank you for you reply.

I have up loaded the input and output files for SAM to the original support request.

Regards

William

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Paul Gilman
More
08 Aug 2014 16:13 #2473 by Paul Gilman
Dear William,

Thank you for sending the files.

The linear Fresnel and other solar models determine the solar radiation incident on the solar field (or array) based on the solar radiation data in the weather file and solar angles that the model calculates from the hour of year, latitude, longitude, and time zone. For your artificial data with constant radiation values, the solar energy incident on the field varies with the day as the solar incidence angle changes throughout the day. That's why you see the system's electrical output varying with time of day in spite of the constant solar radiation data.

Best regards,
Paul.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • williampaulbell
  • Topic Author
More
12 Aug 2014 05:36 #2474 by williampaulbell
Hello

Thank you for the clarification regarding the artificial data that I was using for a sensitivity analysis.

So, SAM shapes the DNI data according to the the hour of year, latitude, longitude, and time zone. This works well for constant input to shape the data into something more realistic.

However, we have DNI data based on readings from the site of the proposed LFR. These DNI readings are a fair indication of the DNI incident on the proposed plant and don't require modification. Could you let me know if SAM would also shape our DNI readings measured taken at the proposed site?

Regards

William Bell

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Paul Gilman
More
12 Aug 2014 18:29 #2475 by Paul Gilman
Dear William,

SAM does not have an option to use incident irradiance data as input. It always converts either horizontal or direct normal irradiance data to incident, depending on the type of system you are modeling. The linear Fresnel model assumes that the field uses single-axis tracking, so the hourly incident irradiance is not the same as the direct normal irradiance.

Best regards,
Paul.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Paul Gilman
Powered by Kunena Forum