- Posts: 73
parabolic trough model: question on IAM
- solarjoe
- Topic Author
        Less
        More
        
            
    
        
            
        
                26 Nov 2013 08:06                #1991
        by solarjoe
    
    
            
            
            
            
            
                                
    
                                                
    
        parabolic trough model: question on IAM was created by solarjoe            
    
        Hello John,
I had a look at the incicent angle modifiers in the SAM library and
all exept one are identical. [1,0.0506,-0.1763]
The second coefficient is positiv for these collectors, so
the incident efficiency will be slightly greater than 1
for small incicent angles. Is this a realistic scenario?
Since I would like to compare commercially available trough collectors,
do you know where I can find the IAMs?
I was searching for a paper or other publications but could not
find anything.
Kind regards,
Joe
    I had a look at the incicent angle modifiers in the SAM library and
all exept one are identical. [1,0.0506,-0.1763]
The second coefficient is positiv for these collectors, so
the incident efficiency will be slightly greater than 1
for small incicent angles. Is this a realistic scenario?
Since I would like to compare commercially available trough collectors,
do you know where I can find the IAMs?
I was searching for a paper or other publications but could not
find anything.
Kind regards,
Joe
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- solarjoe
- Topic Author
        Less
        More
        
            
    
        - Posts: 73
            
        
                27 Nov 2013 05:37                #1992
        by solarjoe
    
    
            
            
            
            
            
                                
    
                                                
    
        Replied by solarjoe on topic parabolic trough model: question on IAM            
    
        I also came across a small typo in the SAM documentation.
(Images are attached to the first post show it).
The equation for the IAM (physical trough model)
is different in the SAM documentation and the
"Technical Manual for the SAM Physical Trough Model"
As I believe the technical manual is correct, the factor
for IAM_2 is theta^2/cos(theta), not (theta/cos(theta))^2 .
    (Images are attached to the first post show it).
The equation for the IAM (physical trough model)
is different in the SAM documentation and the
"Technical Manual for the SAM Physical Trough Model"
As I believe the technical manual is correct, the factor
for IAM_2 is theta^2/cos(theta), not (theta/cos(theta))^2 .
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
        Moderators: Paul Gilman    
 
  
 















