- Posts: 18
Antifreeze. CSP Trough Empirical, Commercial
- Pierre
- Topic Author
Less
More
18 Jul 2013 02:08 #1705
by Pierre
Antifreeze. CSP Trough Empirical, Commercial was created by Pierre
Dear Paul,
I am working with CSP Trough Empirical, Commercial, with 2012.11.30 Version.
I have a question about antifreeze.
I have seen that there are the next parameters:
Antifreeze pumping parasitics (MWh), hourly
Solar field freeze protection energy consumption (MWh), hourly
TES freeze protection energy consumption (MWh), hourly
Tank freeze protection energy(MWh), hourly
But, only the first has a value. Ther others are always zero.
I have changed in "Solar field"-->"Solar field HTF type" in order to have higher values of "Field HTF min operating temp" and have values in all the parameters that I have indicated, but they did not change the value.
What can I do in order to have values of consumption?
Thank you very much.
I am working with CSP Trough Empirical, Commercial, with 2012.11.30 Version.
I have a question about antifreeze.
I have seen that there are the next parameters:
Antifreeze pumping parasitics (MWh), hourly
Solar field freeze protection energy consumption (MWh), hourly
TES freeze protection energy consumption (MWh), hourly
Tank freeze protection energy(MWh), hourly
But, only the first has a value. Ther others are always zero.
I have changed in "Solar field"-->"Solar field HTF type" in order to have higher values of "Field HTF min operating temp" and have values in all the parameters that I have indicated, but they did not change the value.
What can I do in order to have values of consumption?
Thank you very much.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pgilman
Less
More
- Posts: 5423
18 Jul 2013 13:24 #1706
by pgilman
Replied by pgilman on topic Antifreeze. CSP Trough Empirical, Commercial
Dear Pierre,
I have confirmed this behavior in the current version of SAM (2013.1.15), and have asked the CSP modeling team to investigate. I will let you know when I hear more.
Best regards,
Paul.
I have confirmed this behavior in the current version of SAM (2013.1.15), and have asked the CSP modeling team to investigate. I will let you know when I hear more.
Best regards,
Paul.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: pgilman