The performance difference between LFR and CLFR

  • rahter
  • Topic Author
More
06 May 2013 05:57 #1595 by rahter
Dear Gentlemen,

Acc.to your experience, could you please say what the performance difference between LFR and CLFR, in percent is.
We can assume that both LFR and CLFR system is 10MW power and CLFR system has two absorbers per row.


Many thanks in advance.

Regards,
Rahmi

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • pgilman
More
06 May 2013 08:58 #1596 by pgilman
Dear Rahmi,

I am not aware of any studies comparing the performance of compact linear Fresnel and conventional linear Fresnel systems that discuss a general performance difference. I would expect the difference to depend on the design of the two systems under comparison.

I did find this paper that discusses the difference in performance of different CLFR system designs that might be helpful:

Mills, D et al. Compact Linear Fresnel Reflector Solar Thermal Power Plants. (1998) Solar Energy Vol 68, No 3 ( PDF 1.3 MB )

Best regards,
Paul.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • pgilman
More
08 May 2013 12:25 #1597 by pgilman
Dear Rahmi,

The difference in performance between a CLFR and LFR system, or between different systems using the same linear Fresnel technology depends on the specific design characteristics of the system. It is not possible to provide a general value such as the 10% you suggest to describe the relative performance of two types of linear Fresnel system.

One reason for this is that linear Fresnel system designs involve a large number of parameters such as mirror spacing, mirror width, receiver height, receiver size, etc., and optimal values for these parameters are still being determined. For example, some preliminary NREL research suggests that the performance of a LFR system can be greatly improved by using non-uniform mirror spacing.

If you are comparing the performance of these system designs, we recommend that you 1) limit your comparison to specific cases rather than making generalized comparisons, and 2) ensure that the designs of both systems are fully optimized so that your comparison shows differences that can be attributed to the difference in technology and not to inefficient designs.

Ray-tracing is typically used to optimize the collector optimal performance for linear Fresnel and parabolic trough systems. NREL has developed a new analytical tool called FirstOPTIC that uses a new analytical approach to model collector optical performance. Its application for parabolic trough modeling is described in this NREL R&D Highlight ( PDF 292 KB ), and an article describing its use for linear Fresnel is forthcoming in the journal Solar Energy. For more information about FirstOPTIC for parabolic troughs: See Zhu and Lewandowski in Solar Energy Engineering (2012) , and Binott, Zhu, et al. in Solar Energy (2013) .

Best regards,
Paul.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: pgilman
Powered by Kunena Forum