- Posts: 1
CPV System Conversion Efficiency
- IllinoisStateRE
- Topic Author
        Less
        More
        
            
    
        
            
        
                03 Apr 2013 19:36                #1509
        by IllinoisStateRE
    
    
            
            
            
            
            
                                
    
                                                
    
        CPV System Conversion Efficiency  was created by IllinoisStateRE            
    
        We are modeling a CPV system vs Flat Plate at various locations across the US with a wide variety of Solar Resource availability in order to conduct a feasibility study. The real world efficiencies given by SolFocus for their CPV system is 30% module and 28%-29% for the system.  We altered factors to get our module to 30% and then changed the wiring loss factors to 1 to optimize system array efficiency but still get a 3% drop to 27% system efficiency. By inputing values larger than 1 for the wiring loss factor we can obtain a greater system efficiency. Is there any other factors that alter system efficiency other than telling the model that our wires actually increase the efficiency (not possible in this day and age... yet)? We tried soiling derate factors but this did not change anything either.    
    Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Paul Gilman
        Less
        More
        
            
    
        - Posts: 5665
            
        
                05 Apr 2013 15:48                #1510
        by Paul Gilman
    
    
            
            
            
            
            
                                
    
                                                
    
        Replied by Paul Gilman on topic CPV System Conversion Efficiency             
    
        Hello,
Did you take into account the factors on the Performance Adjustment page? The default value of the "percent of annual output" factor of 97% may explain the 3% drop you observed.
Also note that the default value of 0.5% for the "year-to-year decline" factor results in an annual reduction in the system's output that you may not have intended to include in your analysis.
Best regards,
Paul.
    Did you take into account the factors on the Performance Adjustment page? The default value of the "percent of annual output" factor of 97% may explain the 3% drop you observed.
Also note that the default value of 0.5% for the "year-to-year decline" factor results in an annual reduction in the system's output that you may not have intended to include in your analysis.
Best regards,
Paul.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
        Moderators: Paul Gilman    
 
  
 















