- Posts: 1
POA Irradiance
- riqbal@gmail.com
- Topic Author
        Less
        More
        
            
    
        
            
        
                03 Feb 2024 22:58                #12865
        by riqbal@gmail.com
    
    
            
            
            
            
            
                                
    
                                                
    
        POA Irradiance was created by riqbal@gmail.com            
    
        At one of our plant the system is divided into 04 sections with each one at different tilt and orientation. At this site we have one silicon pyranomter installed.
Is it possible to use the measured POA for one of the sub-system and correct it and use it for the other sub-systems. The hope is that these irradiance values will be better than the reference value from the TMY file.
Please provide help with the calculations needed to make this correction. Thank you
    Is it possible to use the measured POA for one of the sub-system and correct it and use it for the other sub-systems. The hope is that these irradiance values will be better than the reference value from the TMY file.
Please provide help with the calculations needed to make this correction. Thank you
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Paul Gilman
        Less
        More
        
            
    
        - Posts: 5665
            
        
                05 Feb 2024 10:03                #12868
        by Paul Gilman
    
    
            
            
            
            
            
                                
    
                                                
    
        Replied by Paul Gilman on topic POA Irradiance            
    
        Hello,
I think I would recommend using the data from the pyranometer for the subarray that has the same tilt and azimuth angle as the pyranometer. For the POA irradiance options (Under "Albedo - Sky Diffuse Model - Irradiance Data (Advanced)" on the Location and Resource page), SAM assumes that the POA data is measured in the same plane as the array.
SAM does not include an option to "correct" POA data for different array orientations. You could manipulate the POA data outside of SAM and use it as input. The weathe file format for SAM's solar models is descrbed in the "SAM CSV Format for Solar" topic in help here, which you can find by clicking Help in SAM or online here: samrepo.nrelcloud.org/help/weather_format_sam_csv_solar.html
Also, if you are comparing measured time series data from the system, you may want to consider using weather data for the year that corresponds with the measured data. For example, if the POA data was measured in 2022, then you would want to use a weather file from 2022 rather than a TMY (typical meteorological year) file.
Best regards,
Paul.
    I think I would recommend using the data from the pyranometer for the subarray that has the same tilt and azimuth angle as the pyranometer. For the POA irradiance options (Under "Albedo - Sky Diffuse Model - Irradiance Data (Advanced)" on the Location and Resource page), SAM assumes that the POA data is measured in the same plane as the array.
SAM does not include an option to "correct" POA data for different array orientations. You could manipulate the POA data outside of SAM and use it as input. The weathe file format for SAM's solar models is descrbed in the "SAM CSV Format for Solar" topic in help here, which you can find by clicking Help in SAM or online here: samrepo.nrelcloud.org/help/weather_format_sam_csv_solar.html
Also, if you are comparing measured time series data from the system, you may want to consider using weather data for the year that corresponds with the measured data. For example, if the POA data was measured in 2022, then you would want to use a weather file from 2022 rather than a TMY (typical meteorological year) file.
Best regards,
Paul.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
        Moderators: Paul Gilman    
 
  
 















