Enhance SAM with features tailored to your specific needs! We collaborate with companies, universities, and organizations to privately fund new capabilities or analyses. Your investment drives innovation while benefiting the broader energy community. Email us to learn more.

Parabolic Trough: Stow and deploy angle

  • Esteban
  • Topic Author
More
05 Feb 2013 09:41 #1245 by Esteban
I have created a CSP physical parabolic trough and then I have changed the Stow Angle in Solar Field from 170 degrees to 175 or 179 degrees, and the thermal energy decreases, just the opposite of what it’s expected.

Also I have checked the effect in other model, where I have modified the deploy angle from 10 degrees to 5 or 1 degree, with reduction in energy too.

Why could it be this reduction in the thermal energy absorbed?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Paul Gilman
More
05 Feb 2013 16:32 #1246 by Paul Gilman
Replied by Paul Gilman on topic Parabolic Trough: Stow and deploy angle
Hello,

Would you mind replying with a copy of your .zsam file attached? I tried the scenario you describe using the default physical trough case, and found that the system's electrical output over the year increases when I change the stow angle from the default 170 degrees to 175 degrees.

Best regards,
Paul.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Paul Gilman
Powered by Kunena Forum