- Posts: 27
ONE-AXIS TRACKING WITH SOLAR PV ARRAYS: SURFACE TILT VERSUS SUN ALTITUDE
- RobertSAM
- Topic Author
Less
More
25 Apr 2022 14:07 #10873
by RobertSAM
ONE-AXIS TRACKING WITH SOLAR PV ARRAYS: SURFACE TILT VERSUS SUN ALTITUDE was created by RobertSAM
My starting assumptions are:
1. Location in Northern Hemisphere, flat ground.
2. Solar pv panels face due South at all times. For the moment I'm assuming an isolated solar PV array with no shading effects present (no row-to-row shading effects, or any other shading).
3. One axis tilting of the array follows only the altitude of the Sun above the local horizon, during the local day time.
I notice that, for some reason, the SAM algorithm assumes that the tilt angle (relative to the horizontal) for the solar pv panels never exceeds 45 degrees - while the Sun altitude is much less than 45 degrees for much of the day time, particularly in the winter months, and is always 0 degrees at Sun-up and Sun-down.
What is the reason for the SAM algorithm assuming that the tilt angle is never more than 45 degrees (corresponding to a Sun altitude of about 45 degrees, when doing one axis tilt simulations)?
I can understand making a preliminary initial design assumption like this when you are simulating a system consisting of a large number of solar panels arranged in two or more rows of equal length (aligned in at East/West direction) and with some row-to-row shading present on account of site area limitations. In practical large size systems, some row-to-row shading will always be present - even if this is small enough to result in an output loss of (say) only 1% of the "zero shading" output.
On the other hand, when you are simply making basic performance comparisons between a system with one-axis tracking versus one having the tilt angle fixed (but possibly allowing for manual adjustment of the tilt angle at intervals during the year), it helps if you can do simulations for the one-axis tracking case with the 45 degree tilt angle limitation absent (e.g. allow the tilt angle to be 85 degrees when the Sun is at 5 degrees above the horizon. etc. ) - in order to get valid comparisons with the simulation results for fixed tilt angles.
Is there any way to bypass the 45 degree tilt angle limitation when doing SAM simulations involving one axis tracking?
Robert T. Chisholm
1. Location in Northern Hemisphere, flat ground.
2. Solar pv panels face due South at all times. For the moment I'm assuming an isolated solar PV array with no shading effects present (no row-to-row shading effects, or any other shading).
3. One axis tilting of the array follows only the altitude of the Sun above the local horizon, during the local day time.
I notice that, for some reason, the SAM algorithm assumes that the tilt angle (relative to the horizontal) for the solar pv panels never exceeds 45 degrees - while the Sun altitude is much less than 45 degrees for much of the day time, particularly in the winter months, and is always 0 degrees at Sun-up and Sun-down.
What is the reason for the SAM algorithm assuming that the tilt angle is never more than 45 degrees (corresponding to a Sun altitude of about 45 degrees, when doing one axis tilt simulations)?
I can understand making a preliminary initial design assumption like this when you are simulating a system consisting of a large number of solar panels arranged in two or more rows of equal length (aligned in at East/West direction) and with some row-to-row shading present on account of site area limitations. In practical large size systems, some row-to-row shading will always be present - even if this is small enough to result in an output loss of (say) only 1% of the "zero shading" output.
On the other hand, when you are simply making basic performance comparisons between a system with one-axis tracking versus one having the tilt angle fixed (but possibly allowing for manual adjustment of the tilt angle at intervals during the year), it helps if you can do simulations for the one-axis tracking case with the 45 degree tilt angle limitation absent (e.g. allow the tilt angle to be 85 degrees when the Sun is at 5 degrees above the horizon. etc. ) - in order to get valid comparisons with the simulation results for fixed tilt angles.
Is there any way to bypass the 45 degree tilt angle limitation when doing SAM simulations involving one axis tracking?
Robert T. Chisholm
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pgilman
Less
More
- Posts: 5423
25 Apr 2022 16:13 #10874
by pgilman
Replied by pgilman on topic ONE-AXIS TRACKING WITH SOLAR PV ARRAYS: SURFACE TILT VERSUS SUN ALTITUDE
Hi Robert,
You can change the value of Tracker rotation limit on the System Design page. It is set to 45 degrees by default, but you can set it to a maximum value of 85 degrees to minimize the effect of the limit.
Best regards,
Paul.
You can change the value of Tracker rotation limit on the System Design page. It is set to 45 degrees by default, but you can set it to a maximum value of 85 degrees to minimize the effect of the limit.
Best regards,
Paul.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RobertSAM
- Topic Author
Less
More
- Posts: 27
26 Apr 2022 12:28 #10884
by RobertSAM
Replied by RobertSAM on topic ONE-AXIS TRACKING WITH SOLAR PV ARRAYS: SURFACE TILT VERSUS SUN ALTITUDE
OK, Paul, great - and many thanks!
Regards, Robert
Regards, Robert
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- badami.abbas
Less
More
- Posts: 2
08 Sep 2022 13:32 #11431
by badami.abbas
Replied by badami.abbas on topic ONE-AXIS TRACKING WITH SOLAR PV ARRAYS: SURFACE TILT VERSUS SUN ALTITUDE
Hi Paul,
What is the Tracker rotation limit considered in PVWatts as there is no option for this in PVwatts?
What is the Tracker rotation limit considered in PVWatts as there is no option for this in PVwatts?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pgilman
Less
More
- Posts: 5423
09 Sep 2022 17:03 #11438
by pgilman
Replied by pgilman on topic ONE-AXIS TRACKING WITH SOLAR PV ARRAYS: SURFACE TILT VERSUS SUN ALTITUDE
Hi Abbas,
PVWatts v8 assumes a rotation limit of 45 degrees for the one-axis tracking option.
Best regards,
Paul.
PVWatts v8 assumes a rotation limit of 45 degrees for the one-axis tracking option.
Best regards,
Paul.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: pgilman