We will be performing a major infrastructure and web site ugprades on Friday, September 27th 8:00 am - 5:00 pm MST (UTC -7).

The website will be down during that time.

AEP sensitivity from MPPT configuration

  • potchara
  • Topic Author
More
19 Jun 2021 17:34 #9728 by potchara
AEP sensitivity from MPPT configuration was created by potchara
Dear All,

I have question regarding the use of MPPT features.
It seem that by utilizing the MPPT inputs, the more input I use, the less overall energy production

I have a system design with
- 90 Modules, 450W
- Inverter with 4 MPPT inputs
- Two Azimuth, 79 and 259 degree.
- Each string have 15 modules in series
- Therefore, we have 6 strings to work with.
- The roof is is allow for 2 string on the 259 degree azimuth and 4 string on the 79 degree azimuth

By common sense, it would be logical to have 2 MPPT input, one for each azimuth.
I have three cases
a) 1 MPPT inputs, 2 subarrays, mismatch
b) 2 MPPT inputs, 2 subarrays, no mismatch
c) 2 MPPT inputs, 2 subarrays, mismatch

The productionwise, (a)>(b)>(c), from inspection the losses diagram, it seem that the main cause of this production lost is the inverter power consumption.
Am I correct that because of the power used by inverter to track the power point (Varying the voltage), the production reduced.

Best,
Potchara S.
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • pgilman
More
21 Jun 2021 21:47 #9737 by pgilman
Replied by pgilman on topic AEP sensitivity from MPPT configuration
Hi Potchara,

The subarray mismatch voltage option at the bottom of the System Design page is intended for modeling inverters with a single MPPT input. We implemented that option before SAM allowed for inverters with up to four MPPT inputs. SAM should probably not allow you to choose the mismatch option for an inverter with more than one MPPT input.

These different options determine the value of the inverter input voltage as follows for a system with two subarrays:

1 MPPT with no mismatch: Inverter input voltage is the average of subarray 1 and subarray 2 operating voltages.

1 MPPT with mismatch: Inverter input voltage is calculated using iterative method described in Dobos (2012) Modeling of Annual DC Energy Losses due to Off Maximum Power Point Operation in PV Arrays .

2 MPPT: Inverter has two inputs with two different voltages allowing each subarray to operate at its maximum power point.

I would expect the total annual output for the three options to be in this order:

2 MPPT > 1 MPPT with mismatch > 1 MPPT with no mismatch

You can explore the effects of these different options by looking at the "Inverter MPPT i]m[/i Nominal DC voltage" and "Subarray i]n[/i Operating DC voltage" outputs. (The MPPT input number may not be the same as the subarray number.)

Best regards,
Paul.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: pgilman
Powered by Kunena Forum

NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.

NREL Home

NREL Research

Follow NREL

NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.