- Posts: 2
Ask (design turbine gross output ) (estimate net output at desig)
- laki
- Topic Author
Less
More
26 Mar 2021 11:05 #9398
by laki
Ask (design turbine gross output ) (estimate net output at desig) was created by laki
Dear Prof;
I want to do a simulation for the CSP for twoer Steam and tower Salt but I face some problems and represented in:
My objective is to simulate 60 MW of solar tower.
when I fill in the system design I confused about the (design turbine gross output ) and (estimate net output at design)
which one do I put the 60 MW in the designed turbine gross output or estimate net output at design? knowing that the estimated gross to net conversion factor is 0.9.
could you tell me which is the best choice to get the right results? from the pictures you will understand my problem
I want to do a simulation for the CSP for twoer Steam and tower Salt but I face some problems and represented in:
My objective is to simulate 60 MW of solar tower.
when I fill in the system design I confused about the (design turbine gross output ) and (estimate net output at design)
which one do I put the 60 MW in the designed turbine gross output or estimate net output at design? knowing that the estimated gross to net conversion factor is 0.9.
could you tell me which is the best choice to get the right results? from the pictures you will understand my problem
Attachments:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pgilman
Less
More
- Posts: 5423
29 Mar 2021 11:18 - 29 Mar 2021 11:19 #9403
by pgilman
Replied by pgilman on topic Ask (design turbine gross output ) (estimate net output at desig)
Dear Lokmane,
The two different nominal capacity values allow you to separate the "nameplate" capacity from the "design" capacity. SAM uses the nameplate capacity to calculate costs. It uses the "design" capacity to size the physical system.
For example, the default physical trough system has a nameplate capacity of 100 MW and a design capacity of 111 MW. This means that the project costs will be calculated from the 100 MW value, and the solar field will be sized for a power cycle with a nominal capacity of 111 MW.
If you do not need to separate the capacity values in this way, then you could set the "Estimated gross to net conversion factor" to one and use 60 MW as both the nameplate and design capacity.
Best regards,
Paul.
The two different nominal capacity values allow you to separate the "nameplate" capacity from the "design" capacity. SAM uses the nameplate capacity to calculate costs. It uses the "design" capacity to size the physical system.
For example, the default physical trough system has a nameplate capacity of 100 MW and a design capacity of 111 MW. This means that the project costs will be calculated from the 100 MW value, and the solar field will be sized for a power cycle with a nominal capacity of 111 MW.
If you do not need to separate the capacity values in this way, then you could set the "Estimated gross to net conversion factor" to one and use 60 MW as both the nameplate and design capacity.
Best regards,
Paul.
Last edit: 29 Mar 2021 11:19 by pgilman.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: pgilman