- Posts: 2
ITC normalization?
- klucas@seia.org
- Topic Author
Less
More
17 Mar 2021 08:03 #9379
by klucas@seia.org
ITC normalization? was created by klucas@seia.org
Hi,
I am looking to model the impact of ITC normalization required for utility ownership (spreading the ITC over the life of the project) compared to PPAs from third-parties (applying 5-year MACRS). What financial models and settings will most directly mimic a rate-base return for utilities?
Thanks,
Kevin
I am looking to model the impact of ITC normalization required for utility ownership (spreading the ITC over the life of the project) compared to PPAs from third-parties (applying 5-year MACRS). What financial models and settings will most directly mimic a rate-base return for utilities?
Thanks,
Kevin
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pgilman
Less
More
- Posts: 5423
17 Mar 2021 17:01 - 17 Mar 2021 17:01 #9380
by pgilman
Replied by pgilman on topic ITC normalization?
Hi Kevin,
I was not aware of this tax normalization issue for for-profit utilities, but found these helpful articles to learn about it:
I am a little confused by your question about "rate-based return" because I'm not sure how that term relates to "ITC normalization."
Best regards,
Paul.
I was not aware of this tax normalization issue for for-profit utilities, but found these helpful articles to learn about it:
- www.utilitydive.com/news/itc-tax-normalization-limits-solar-growth-and-favors-fossil-fuels/577920/
- www.communityenergyinc.com/solaritcpaper
I am a little confused by your question about "rate-based return" because I'm not sure how that term relates to "ITC normalization."
Best regards,
Paul.
Last edit: 17 Mar 2021 17:01 by pgilman.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- klucas@seia.org
- Topic Author
Less
More
- Posts: 2
17 Mar 2021 17:14 #9382
by klucas@seia.org
Replied by klucas@seia.org on topic ITC normalization?
Paul,
Thanks for the reply. IOUs are required to spread the ITC over the life of the project, so a 30-year asset would get 1/30 of the ITC benefit each year. Maybe setting a custom depreciation schedule at 3.33% per year and ticking the ITC check marks might accomplish this?
The rate-based return comment was not directly related to the ITC normalization. I was referring to cost of service regulation where the utility gets straight-line depreciation of the asset and earns a regulated rate of return on the net asset value plus recovery of expenses and taxes Essentially, I am trying to compare the revenue requirement of a utility-owned, rate-based project to a PPA from an IPP for the same size project with the same capital costs. I am not sure which model best duplicates the utility ownership structure.
Thanks,
Kevin
Thanks for the reply. IOUs are required to spread the ITC over the life of the project, so a 30-year asset would get 1/30 of the ITC benefit each year. Maybe setting a custom depreciation schedule at 3.33% per year and ticking the ITC check marks might accomplish this?
The rate-based return comment was not directly related to the ITC normalization. I was referring to cost of service regulation where the utility gets straight-line depreciation of the asset and earns a regulated rate of return on the net asset value plus recovery of expenses and taxes Essentially, I am trying to compare the revenue requirement of a utility-owned, rate-based project to a PPA from an IPP for the same size project with the same capital costs. I am not sure which model best duplicates the utility ownership structure.
Thanks,
Kevin
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pgilman
Less
More
- Posts: 5423
18 Mar 2021 13:23 #9383
by pgilman
Replied by pgilman on topic ITC normalization?
Hi Kevin,
SAM's PPA models are designed for IPP projects, so they do not have these features that would apply to an IOU owner.
For the normalized ITC: I think you could model this by setting the ITC on the Incentives page to zero and reducing the Federal Tax Rate by the normalized ITC amount. For example, given a federal income tax rate of 30%, 26% ITC, and 30-year analysis period, you would use Federal Tax Rate = 0.30 - 0. 26 * 0.0333 = 0.291, or 29.1%.
The "ITC Qualification" check boxes on the Depreciation input page determine whether the portion of the capital cost associated with a given depreciation class qualifies for the ITC. But, for this normalized ITC, we are setting the ITC to zero, so the check boxes should have no effect on the results.
Best regards,
Paul.
SAM's PPA models are designed for IPP projects, so they do not have these features that would apply to an IOU owner.
For the normalized ITC: I think you could model this by setting the ITC on the Incentives page to zero and reducing the Federal Tax Rate by the normalized ITC amount. For example, given a federal income tax rate of 30%, 26% ITC, and 30-year analysis period, you would use Federal Tax Rate = 0.30 - 0. 26 * 0.0333 = 0.291, or 29.1%.
The "ITC Qualification" check boxes on the Depreciation input page determine whether the portion of the capital cost associated with a given depreciation class qualifies for the ITC. But, for this normalized ITC, we are setting the ITC to zero, so the check boxes should have no effect on the results.
Best regards,
Paul.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Weimin-Dang
Less
More
- Posts: 1
06 Apr 2023 22:40 #12038
by Weimin-Dang
Replied by Weimin-Dang on topic ITC normalization?
Hi Kevin, if you would like to discuss ITC normalization modeling, I would be happy to do that. - Weimin
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: pgilman