- Posts: 4
Negatie results in the Water Heating model
- mmonesterio
- Topic Author
Less
More
03 Dec 2020 16:34 - 04 Dec 2020 16:00 #9057
by mmonesterio
Negatie results in the Water Heating model was created by mmonesterio
I'e been racking my brain to figure out why my results are coming out negative. As you can see from the graph the results are what you would expect however all are negative. I've looked in the forum for similar posting but the only one was from '12, and I'm sure that's not it.
your assistance would be greatly appreciated. I'e attached the model file.
your assistance would be greatly appreciated. I'e attached the model file.
Attachments:
Last edit: 04 Dec 2020 16:00 by pgilman.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pgilman
Less
More
- Posts: 5423
04 Dec 2020 16:13 #9060
by pgilman
Replied by pgilman on topic Negatie results in the Water Heating model
Hi,
You might compare your inputs to the default cause to see what is causing the negative energy savings.
In the attached version of your file, I added a "Default" case that you can use for the comparison. The Inputs Browser (File, Inputs browser) lists of inputs that have different values between the two cases. One culprit might be the pump power, which seems out of scale with the other inputs.
Best regards,
Paul.
You might compare your inputs to the default cause to see what is causing the negative energy savings.
In the attached version of your file, I added a "Default" case that you can use for the comparison. The Inputs Browser (File, Inputs browser) lists of inputs that have different values between the two cases. One culprit might be the pump power, which seems out of scale with the other inputs.
Best regards,
Paul.
Attachments:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mmonesterio
- Topic Author
Less
More
- Posts: 4
05 Dec 2020 01:40 #9065
by mmonesterio
Replied by mmonesterio on topic Negatie results in the Water Heating model
thanks for the quick response Paul. I did get positive numbers but only when I reduced the pump W from ~10kW to > 20W before all months went positive.
However with 240 collectors (19'x7' ea.) I need a large flow and 20W aint going to do it. so something is still off. I am using the collector's test flow rate to arrive at the total flow.
Best
However with 240 collectors (19'x7' ea.) I need a large flow and 20W aint going to do it. so something is still off. I am using the collector's test flow rate to arrive at the total flow.
Best
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mmonesterio
- Topic Author
Less
More
- Posts: 4
07 Jan 2021 11:37 #9161
by mmonesterio
Replied by mmonesterio on topic Negative results in the Water Heating model
I'e changed some of the flow parameters and am now getting results which make sense. Thanks for your help!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: pgilman