- Posts: 2
more Heat loss at design (receivers) has more energy output?
- zeyad
- Topic Author
Less
More
29 Jun 2012 06:56 #667
by zeyad
more Heat loss at design (receivers) has more energy output? was created by zeyad
Dear sir
By duplicating two typical cases and only changing the value of the heat loss at design (receivers)
The strange result is that the case with more heat loss has more Q absorbed, Q dumped,
Q field output and more net annual energy.
Is this an error or maybe I have misunderstood something.
(These cases are done by SCHOTT 2008 and siemens tube, and both have the same errors.)
I appreciate your help
Thank you
Regards
Zeyad Yasser
By duplicating two typical cases and only changing the value of the heat loss at design (receivers)
The strange result is that the case with more heat loss has more Q absorbed, Q dumped,
Q field output and more net annual energy.
Is this an error or maybe I have misunderstood something.
(These cases are done by SCHOTT 2008 and siemens tube, and both have the same errors.)
I appreciate your help
Thank you
Regards
Zeyad Yasser
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pgilman
Less
More
- Posts: 5423
05 Jul 2012 15:19 #668
by pgilman
Replied by pgilman on topic more Heat loss at design (receivers) has more energy output?
Dear Zeyad Yasser,
I assume you are running either the physical trough model or the empirical trough model. In either case, on the Solar Field page under Field Layout, if you choose Option 1 Solar Multiple, SAM adjusts the solar field area to account for the heat loss at design value. That may explain why Q absorbed increased when when you increased the heat loss at design value -- SAM increased the field area to ensure that under design conditions, the solar field can drive the power block at its nameplate capacity.
Best regards,
Paul.
I assume you are running either the physical trough model or the empirical trough model. In either case, on the Solar Field page under Field Layout, if you choose Option 1 Solar Multiple, SAM adjusts the solar field area to account for the heat loss at design value. That may explain why Q absorbed increased when when you increased the heat loss at design value -- SAM increased the field area to ensure that under design conditions, the solar field can drive the power block at its nameplate capacity.
Best regards,
Paul.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: pgilman