- Posts: 2
Near Shading Losses
- tdornbusch
- Topic Author
Less
More
17 Aug 2018 10:12 #6414
by tdornbusch
Near Shading Losses was created by tdornbusch
I am trying to replicate in SAM a solar PV system model that I have created in both PVSyst and PlantPredict. The models in these two systems are within a
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pgilman
Less
More
- Posts: 5423
20 Aug 2018 14:24 #6415
by pgilman
Replied by pgilman on topic Near Shading Losses
Hello,
The difference between the different models depends in part on how consistent the inputs are. We have posted some papers describing comparisons between SAM and other PV models here:
sam.nrel.gov/case-studies
I suspect there may be differences between the way shading is represented in the different models. Which shading options did you use in SAM? For example, did you specify shading loss percentages by time step, using the month-by-hour table, or the solar-azimuth-by-altitude angle table? If you used the time series option, did you enable the partial shading model? For the comparison, you should be sure to choose options in SAM that are the most similar to the options in the other models.
Best regards,
Paul.
The difference between the different models depends in part on how consistent the inputs are. We have posted some papers describing comparisons between SAM and other PV models here:
sam.nrel.gov/case-studies
I suspect there may be differences between the way shading is represented in the different models. Which shading options did you use in SAM? For example, did you specify shading loss percentages by time step, using the month-by-hour table, or the solar-azimuth-by-altitude angle table? If you used the time series option, did you enable the partial shading model? For the comparison, you should be sure to choose options in SAM that are the most similar to the options in the other models.
Best regards,
Paul.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: pgilman