- Posts: 1
Shading/Solmetric Import Annual production reduced by too much?
- lovallo2
- Topic Author
Less
More
23 May 2018 12:14 #6269
by lovallo2
Shading/Solmetric Import Annual production reduced by too much? was created by lovallo2
Hello,
I am modeling a 70 kW array in chicago. Without shading the estimate is about 91,000 kWh.
In Solmetric my annual solar availability is 89%. This is on the roof of a highrise and only a small penthouse can cause shading.
Once I import the hourly solmetric file into SAM the production estimate drops to 62,000 kWh - a decrease of 32%!
I have carefully reviewed which skyline files are going into the shading analysis, wondering if anyone has any experience or advice?
I will attach the hourly shading export to this question, I am not sure how to interpret it yet.
Thanks,
Alex
I am modeling a 70 kW array in chicago. Without shading the estimate is about 91,000 kWh.
In Solmetric my annual solar availability is 89%. This is on the roof of a highrise and only a small penthouse can cause shading.
Once I import the hourly solmetric file into SAM the production estimate drops to 62,000 kWh - a decrease of 32%!
I have carefully reviewed which skyline files are going into the shading analysis, wondering if anyone has any experience or advice?
I will attach the hourly shading export to this question, I am not sure how to interpret it yet.
Thanks,
Alex
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pgilman
Less
More
- Posts: 5423
29 May 2018 09:44 #6270
by pgilman
Replied by pgilman on topic Shading/Solmetric Import Annual production reduced by too much?
Dear Alex,
I did a test simulation with the shading file you attached, and saw a 85% difference between results with shading and results without, which seems more in line with the "annual availability" value you report above.
Would you mind sending me your .sam file so I can see your other assumptions? You can either attach it to your original post by editing it, or [url=mailto:sam.support t=_self]email it to me[/url].
Best regards,
Paul.
I did a test simulation with the shading file you attached, and saw a 85% difference between results with shading and results without, which seems more in line with the "annual availability" value you report above.
Would you mind sending me your .sam file so I can see your other assumptions? You can either attach it to your original post by editing it, or [url=mailto:sam.support t=_self]email it to me[/url].
Best regards,
Paul.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: pgilman