Physical Trough Model Optical Efficiency

  • Poole
  • Topic Author
More
04 Jun 2016 02:44 #4499 by Poole
Dear Paul,

I am in the process of running a simulation using molten salt in a parabolic trough plant.
I am using the FLABEG Ultimate Trough with a 70mm receiver. When I calculate the design point optical efficiency I get the same figure as SAM: 0.882677. However when I run the simulation, the optical efficiency reaches a maximum of approximately 0.77. The cosine efficiency and IAM are both close to 1. I am unsure what is causing the additional loss in optical efficiency.

Any help would be great!

Thanks,
Ian

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • solarjoe
More
07 Jun 2016 05:23 #4500 by solarjoe
Replied by solarjoe on topic Physical Trough Model Optical Efficiency
Are all optical parameters identical?
(Slope error, tracking errors, reflectance, soiling)

Could you provide the SAM file?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • pgilman
More
07 Jun 2016 17:19 #4501 by pgilman
Replied by pgilman on topic Physical Trough Model Optical Efficiency
Dear Ian,

The design point optical efficiency assumes the zenith angle = 0 degrees. In many locations, the sun is never actually directly overhead, which results in the observed difference. You can verify this in SAM's time series results by looking at the value of the "Resource Solar Zenith" output variable at noon on June 21.

Best regards,
Paul.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: pgilman
Powered by Kunena Forum