Enhance SAM with features tailored to your specific needs! We collaborate with companies, universities, and organizations to privately fund new capabilities or analyses. Your investment drives innovation while benefiting the broader energy community. Email us to learn more.

Attenuation default in SAM different to Wagner (2008)

  • Lukas H
  • Topic Author
More
05 Mar 2016 13:06 #4136 by Lukas H
Hi all,

I got a question regarding the atmospheric attenuation model for Central Receiver Systems (salt) in V2015.6.30: The constant component of the attenuation loss is: '0.006789' while Eq.(2.6) in Wagner (2008) reads slightly differently: '0.006739'

Although the difference is marginal, I would like to know which of the two is the correct one. Maybe there is a typo in one of them or a slightly different curve fit was done?

Many thanks

Lukas

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Paul Gilman
More
07 Mar 2016 09:44 #4137 by Paul Gilman
Dear Lukas,

That is a very small difference. You may want to check the reference in Wagner's thesis. It mentions a 1976 Hottel article in Solar Energy Vol 18 pp. 129 as a reference for Equation 2.6.

Best regards,
Paul.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Paul Gilman
Powered by Kunena Forum