Limitations of 3D shade modeling for PV systems

  • mrogers
  • Topic Author
More
22 Sep 2015 23:22 #3737 by mrogers
I'm trying to model performance of a flat plate PV system that is shaded by a wall to the southeast. The simulation is showing poorer performance than I expected.

I see a note in the "Add active surface objects" help section that says the active surface object is intended to represent a small rooftop array or subarray and that it is not designed to represent a row in a large roof or ground mounted array that has many rows.

In this case the modeled array is 3 rows of 14 modules and I now have the first row as one active element and is subarray 1. Rows 2 and 3 are both part of subarray 2.

If I'm doing this wrong, any advice on how it should be modeled for accurate results?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Paul Gilman
More
23 Sep 2015 16:54 #3738 by Paul Gilman
Replied by Paul Gilman on topic Limitations of 3D shade modeling for PV systems
Would you mind [url=mailto:sam.support@nrel.gov?subject=SAM%20File%20with%20Shading%20Scene%20from%20Support%20Forum t=_self]emailing me a copy [/url]of the .sam file with your shading scene? I'll take a look and see if anything seems wrong.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Paul Gilman
Powered by Kunena Forum